Tag Archives: natalie portman

I Love Movies, But I Hate Yours: Thor

Kicking off 2011’s summer of big-budget blockbusters is superhero flick “Thor,” probably one of the most challenging stories for Marvel Studios to adapt onto the silver screen from the pages of a comic book. This is not necessarily because of the arguably second-rate awareness of the eponymous character himself, but because creating “Thor” requires one to create a fantasy world, another dimension which must convince and adequately intrigue general movie-goers. Unlike the company’s recent cinematic triumphs such as “Iron Man” and “The Incredible Hulk,” “Thor” takes place partially in a realm separate from our own, one with its own rich history and logic, and to build this calls for an ambience of epicness, which director Kenneth Branagh has thankfully relished in.

This world of which I speak is Asgard, which is located in a magical dimension that is certainly not our own. Its design is of polished gold, its grand kingdom furnished specifically for a noble king. This king is Odin (Anthony Hopkins, “The Wolfman”), a white-bearded god with a metallic eye patch covering his right peeper. He has a wife, Frigga (Rene Russo, “Yours, Mine and Ours”), and two sons, Thor (Chris Hemsworth, “Star Trek”) and Loki (Tom Hiddleston, “Archipelago”).

Thor is the eldest of the two brothers, and is thus heir to the powerful thrown. As pointed out by his father, he is arrogant, vain, greedy and cruel. He wears a red cape and wields a powerful hammer called Mjolnir, a mighty mallet that can cause more damage than when a packet of Mentos is dropped into a bottle of Diet Coke. Seriously, that combination can take an eye out.

After a breach in Asgard’s security almost leads to the theft of a sacred artefact, Thor decides to take matters into his own massive hands, and (despite his father’s insistence that it would do no good) attempts revenge on the evil Frost Giants (just go with it). Following his defiance, Thor is banished from Asgard for the trouble he has caused and the war he has resparked, stripped of his armour and his beloved power-giving hammer.

He winds up on Earth, in the New Mexico desert to be exact, and meets mortal scientists Jane Foster (Natalie Portman, “Black Swan”), Erik Selvig (Stellan Skarsgård, “Mamma Mia!”) and Darcy Lewis (Kat Dennings, “Defendor”). Assuming the rambling Norse god is a deluded drunk, they zap him with a tazer and take him to the hospital, where he inflicts some unprovoked violence on the unsuspecting staff. From here on, the trio are stuck with a man they believe to be a schizophrenic nutcase, but become more and more convinced by his claims that he is indeed Thor, god of thunder and son of Odin, as he tries to get back into Asgard and hold his enormous tool in his hand once again. I can hear you sniggering.

Meanwhile, in Thor’s homely kingdom, Loki sees his chance to become ruler of Asgard, what with dad’s favourite son being cast down to Earth. He is determined that his overshadowing brother never returns from his exile, while the god of mischief plots to take over the reigning role of his elderly father. Maybe he got bored of taking over Jim Carrey’s body and dancing to jazz music with Cameron Diaz. SSSMOKIN’!

“Thor” is high camp, with Norse gods marching about in glistening armour and horned helmets that look neck-crushingly heavy, yelling at each other in perfectly stated Shakespearean English. The scenes in the grandiose kingdom of Asgard may have run the risk of being pretty darn laughable, but there’s an unexpected sternness to them that counteracts any possible corniness. If anything, the scenes on Earth are cheesier than that of the alien realm. Also, it’s difficult to not get caught up in what is ultimately a very fascinating world unlike our own, all rendered in beautiful CGI.

In true blockbuster fashion, the film is a special-effect spectacle that’s bursting at the seems with computerised trickery, all showcased in post-converted 3D (which I should add is barely noticeable after a while). This is not only utilised to create the fantasy world of Asgard, but also the menacing robotic Destroyer, guardian of a sacred Asgardian artifact, his head opening up to blast out a raging fireball that roasts any nearby enemies. There’s also the cold-as-ice Frost Giants, a whole species of monsters who live in a land made of ice (Jotunheim, not Iceland). Their skin is chilled blue, and their eyes are as red as the cheeks of a schoolboy who’s just had his trousers yanked down to his ankles in the playground. These creatures will chill you to the bone. Literally.

Our godly hero is played stunningly by hunky Hemsworth, bringing a knowing sense of cheek and swagger to the hammer-thumping role. The Australian actor, standing at 6’3″ tall, is a mammoth of a man, bound in muscles and oozing with genuine on-screen charisma, making for an enthralling and amusing protagonist for us to root for. When he dons his helmet, swings his hammer and yells at the top of his lungs, you know this man means serious business.

There’s also Hopkins and Hiddleston as a father and son who struggle to connect with each other, the father always having favoured his older boy. Hopkins is not as hammy as usual, his character’s status as a god fulfilled by the sheer gravitas of Mr. Hannibal Lecter’s performance. Hiddleston manages to get across a sense of jealousy over the attention Thor receives, which raises his ambitions to show ‘em all what he’s made of and rule the whole of Asgard all by himself, while yearning to impress his father.

Given that this is English director Kenneth Branagh’s first real venture outside of Shakespeare adaptations and period dramas, “Thor” is ruddy impressive. He gives a full sense of a truly epic scope, perfectly balancing moments of fantastical absurdity with moments of lighthearted fish-out-of-water humour (like when Thor charges into a pet store and demands to be given a horse). The film is also tantalising when the action kick-starts and the hammers fly, the more adrenaline-pumped sequences suitably thrilling. I wasn’t sure if Branagh could handle it all, but by Odin’s beard, he does. He should calm down on all the Dutch tilts, though; they damn near gave me a headache.

In the run-up to next year’s massively anticipated “The Avengers,” “Thor” gives more promise to the mouth-watering prospect of the on-screen team-up of Captain America, Iron Man, The Hulk and Thor. However, the film doesn’t feel like one big advertisement (ahem, “Iron Man 2″) for the big event, instead simply taking on the role of a magnificent, technically-impressive comic-book fantasy that excites, enchants and thoroughly entertains. You’re up next, Captain America. Don’t disappoint us.

Nine Outta Ten

-Watson

Leave a Comment

Filed under Movies, Review, Special Guest Blogger, Trailers

SuperDPS Obligatory 2011 Golden Globe Predictions

Well it’s that exciting time again to passively watch and potentially immerse ourselves in what is–and let’s be honest–essentially a watered-down version of the Academy Awards. And it’s good that we have The Golden Globes, because how else would shitfest features like Burlesque be hurled, frightened and confused, into an award ceremony, led to believe that it has an equal opportunity to win a shiny trophy.

The host, Ricky Gervais, is one of my favorite people ever, so I’m very excited to see what he brings to the show this time around. His honesty and irreverence makes, in my opinion, one of the best hosts of all time as well.

As I did last year, I will post the predictions here and then update them in real time as the ceremony progresses, highlighting correct predictions and lamenting the incorrect.

(Updates are marked with a “#”)

So let’s get started:

Best Supporting Actor: Andrew Garfield (The Social Network)

#(Winner: Christian Bale (The Fighter)–Whatever. I didn’t see the movie, but he’s a great actor and he’s lookin’ sharp, too. The biggest shame is that they didn’t give enough time for Bale to get wasted before the first award announcement of the night. Maybe next time.)

#Best Actress in a TV Drama: For some reason I forgot to add this in, but I’m so glad the winner is Katey Sagal from Sons of Anarchy…one of the best series of the year! I didn’t make a prediction for this, but I feel like I would have chosen her from the list of nominees…so I’m just gonna say this is a victory for me.

Best Miniseries or Made for TV Movie: The Pacific

#(Winner: Carlos–No idea what this is or what it’s about. I think it’s the life story of Carlos Mencia…)

Best Supporting Actor in a Series, Miniseries, or Made for TV Movie: Eric Stonestreet (Modern Family)

#(Winner: The Gay Kid from GLEE–I don’t like GLEE, but fucking amazing speech)

Best Actor in a TV Drama: Steve Buscemi (Boardwalk Empire)

#(Winner: YAY! I was right. Now he won’t have to smear lipstick on his face and cross the head of the foreign press off of his hit list.)

Best TV Drama: Boardwalk Empire

#(Winner: Right again! This totally deserved to win, although it was a really hard category. I love every show that was nominated. I’m more excited that I guessed two in a row. I mean, really, this is my night.)

Best Original Song: Coming Home (Country Strong)

#(Winner: You Haven’t Seen the Last of Me (Burlesque)–What bullshit. Can we just pretend this never happened?)

Best Original Score: Hans Zimmer (Inception)

#(Winner: Trent Reznor (The Social Network)–This would’ve been my second choice. Glad it went to a worthy movie. Original Score is a better category than Best Original Song, anyways. Reznor made this movie even better.)

Best Animated Feature Film: Toy Story 3

#(Winner: Big win, and obvious. Gotta admit, I was scared of The Illusionist, but I didn’t see it, so I thought I’d go with my favorite. “Were you two even born when the first Toy Story came out?” Priceless.)

Best Actress in a Comedy: Julianne Moore (The Kids Are All Right)

#(Winner: Annette Benning (The Kids Are All Right)–Right movie, wrong chick. Didn’t see it. Can’t comment.)

Best Actor in a Miniseries or Made for TV Movie: Al Pacino (You Don’t Know Jack)

#(Winner: Al Pacino, right again. He could’ve easily lost this, but I figured he won all the awards before, so it must be good. Didn’t see it. Controversy equals awards.)

Best Actress in Miniseries or Made for TV movie: Claire Danes (Temple Grandin)

#(Winner: Claire Danes again! Must be a good movie. But how many toothpicks can Temple Grandin count?)

Best Screenplay: The Social Network

#(Winner: Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network)–Can’t help it. Best movie of the year! The dialogue is so quick and so spot-on, it can’t help but win the best writing. You must agree…or else.)

Best Supporting Actress in a Series, Miniseries, or Made for TV Movie: Kelly McDonald (Boardwalk Empire)

#(Winner: Jane Lynch (GLEE)–Don’t know much about GLEE, only seen a couple episodes, but I have no love or interest in GLEE at the moment. Maybe I’ll get into it a year after it’s cancelled.)

Best Foreign Language Film: I Am Love

#(Winner: In a Better World–Fair enough. I didn’t see any of these movies. I just tried to pick the most positive-sounding one. That usually works for foreign films. Right? Right?!)

Best Actress in a TV Comedy or Musical: Tina Fey (30 Rock)

#(Winner: Laura Linney (The Big C)–OK. I don’t get it, but whatever. 30 Rock is definitely one of–if not the–funniest show on TV right now. But cancer’s funny, too, I guess.)

Best Actor in a TV Comedy or Musical: Thomas Jane (Hung)

#(Winner: Jim Parsons (The Big Bang Theory)–Ricky Gervais was right. You always win if you play someone who’s retarded. The Big Bang Theory is a decent show. Definitely stands out amongst most shitty TV comedies these days.)

Best Supporting Actress: Helena Bonham Carter (The King’s Speech)

#(Winner: Melissa Leo (The Fighter)–Didn’t see the movie, but great. At least ridiculous-looking Helena Bonham Carter didn’t have to get on stage. Don’t want to give Tim Burton the satisfaction.)

#(CECIL B. DEMILLE AWARD: Robert DiNiro. OK.)

Best Director: Christopher Nolan (Inception)

#(Winner: David Fincher (The Social Network)–I was hoping that The Social Network would sweep, but I wasn’t confident enough. Glad this award went to the director of my favorite film of the year.)

Best TV Comedy or Musical: 30 Rock

#(Winner: GLEE–Can’t say that I’m surprised, but I don’t get it. OK, I get it, but I don’t get it. So many album sales and so many viewers. I liked the atheist episode…Christ, I don’t know what to say. The longer this ceremony goes, the drunker I get, so I’ll just end it with congrats, Glee.)

Best Actor in a Comedy: Kevin Spacey (Casino Jack)

#(Winner: Paul Giamatti (Barney’s Vision)–No idea what this movie is or what it’s about. I’m glad it won, though…if only to see Paul Giamatti drunk and high on chocolate on stage. Brilliant.)

Best Actress in a Drama: Natalie Portman (Black Swan)

#(Winner: Natalie Portman!!!!111111!!!!–An obvious choice. Most intense acting I’ve seen in a long time. This movie will stay with me in my nightmares forever. I hope she has a super-awesome baby who George Lucas can exploit in Star Wars remakes, reimaginings, and re-whatevers in the future.)

Best Comedy or Musical Motion Picture: The Kids Are All Right

#(Winner: Obviously. Who else was going to win this? Burlesque was robbed! Oh, it was for BEST comedy or musical. Sorry. Apologies.)

Best Actor in a Drama: Jesse Eisenberg (The Social Network)

#(Winner: Colin Firth (The King’s Speech)–Sonofabitch. Oh well. I can’t say I didn’t see it coming. I can see that Colin Firth actually had to play a distinct and difficult role. All Jesse Eisenberg had to do was talk faster. British actors always have an unfair advantage when it comes to playing–well–anything.)

Best Drama Motion Picture: The Social Network

#(Winner: YAY! Best movie! I’m so happy this won. I never thought I’d be so excited for Jesse Eisenberg, but I can’t imagine a better actor for the role. Everyone involved in this did an incredible job. I went out of my way to a special theatre to see it. Good night everyone, and thank you to those who followed me tonight…and sorry to those who were annoyed by my constant updates.)

Check back with us starting at 8PM (EST) to get the updates as we get them and see where we went horribly wrong.

(return to MAIN PAGE)

2 Comments

Filed under Arts, Events, Hot News, Movies, Music, News, Top Story

SuperDPS Review of Black Swan

I’ve never been much of a fan of ballet. I admire the art form, I’m astonished by the skill of the performers, but, like opera, I wouldn’t be particularly fond of sitting in a theatre and watching an entire show. Perhaps I’m not arty or tasteful enough, but I’d most likely end up just imagining how bruised and battered the performers’ toes must be, instead of paying attention to the spectacle itself.

Still, there’s something about Darren Aronofsky’s “Black Swan” that enticed me in a way that few movies have done before. Like Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s “The Red Shoes” of 1948, Aronofsky’s disturbing drama portrays the dancing art in a beautiful light that entrances and allures, heightening the impact of events that take place off-stage.

The film centres on a fresh-faced dancer, Nina Sayers (Natalie Portman, “V for Vendetta“), aged 28. She’s committed to her profession, almost unhealthily, and is determined to reach what all ballerinas see as the pinnacle of success — to be The Swan Queen in a New York production of Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s “Swan Lake.”

The current Swan Queen, Beth MacIntyre (Winona Ryder, “Edward Scissorhands“), has just “retired,” and her position needs to be filled. Nina sees her chance and goes about auditioning for the role. The director of the production, Thomas Leroy (Vincent Cassel, “Mesrine“), is at first unconvinced by Nina’s performances, but gives her the part when she bites his lip. Hurrah!

Nina rehearses and rehearses, striving for perfection, to impress Thomas, to become the Swan Queen. Her fellow ballerinas look upon her with jealousy, while Lily (Mila Kunis, AKA the voice of Meg on “Family Guy“) strikes an unlikely friendship with the leading lady. However, Lily’s motivations become questionable when Nina gets to know her a little better.

With “Black Swan,” Aronofsky confronts melodrama and darkens it, spinning it away from the stage of cliché. The film is intimidating in tone, much more distressing than one might imagine upon learning of the general plot. Several scenes had me cringing at the imagery, some including self-mutilation. The images the film conjures up will make one turn one’s head from the screen, if briefly. If you were to glance at me as I watched “Black Swan,” you’d swear I was watching John Carpenter’s “The Thing.”

Portman’s character is a fragile one, seemingly virginal, called “weak” by Thomas, controlled by her overbearing ex-ballerina mother, Erica (Barbara Hershey, “The Portrait of a Lady”). She is told that she shines as the innocent White Swan, but falters when portraying the seductive Black Swan. Obsessed with perfection, she lets the double-character role consume her out of desperation for flawlessness on the big night itself.

Portman is spellbinding in the role, playing a girl whose entire life revolves around her skills as a dancer. Her character begins to lose sight of what’s real, her grip on reality loosening as her life spirals into a hallucinatory nightmare, the likes of which David Lynch should be proud.

Kunis, on the other hand, portrays a more laid-back girl, showing up late for rehearsals, her prowess as a dancer more befitting the Black Swan than Nina’s techniques. She’s the party-going type, introducing Nina to alcohol, drugs and sex, awakening something long-buried within Nina’s persona. Kunis’ performance dares to be as fascinating as Portman’s, and succeeds, her underrated talents worthy of much more attention than they get.

Cassel is delightful as the runner of the production, of which his character is aptly passionate. A French prick by profession, he tries to get Nina to let go of her innocence and indulge in her sensual and sexual side, his attempts altering her mannerisms, morphing her into a more violent and unstable person.

As Thomas tells Nina to let go of her painstakingly memorised moves and lose herself in the performance, Aronofsky does the same. He utilises a similar shooting method as his very own “The Wrestler,” using handheld cameras to their stylistic advantage, putting us up on stage with the performing ballerinas as if we are one of them, frolicking for the audience in white tutus.

The “Requiem for a Dream” director gets up close and personal with the well-choreographed dancers as they strut their stuff, his work not feeling perfected or polished to death, but fresh and almost improvised. The cinematography by Matthew Libatique (“The Fountain,” “Iron Man“) works wonders with Aronofsky’s beautiful and bold direction, the dark and icy visuals dancing off the screen.

Black Swan” is unlike anything I have ever seen before. It’s part psychological thriller, part drama, part horror, all pliéing together with seductive and bizarre results. It’s an awe-inspiring portrayal of a woman transformed from an innocent to a beast, from White Swan to Black Swan, her determination driving her mad. Oh, and if your five-year-old daughter asks to see “the new ballerina movie,” I’d advise against taking her.

10 outta 10

Watson

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arts, Movies, Review, Special Guest Blogger, Top Story, Trailers

Natalie Portman’s Rant on Meat is Murder…

alexbwIf Natalie Portman’s shaved head and sharp intellect didn’t frighten your dick into recession, her latest outburst in Huffington Post surely will. Now, I like Natalie Portman. She was unquestionably the sexiest part of Mr. Magorium’s Wonder Imporium. Apathetic women aren’t particularly attractive, but neither are overly militant ones.

Portman’s article for the Huffington Post stems largely from her reading of Jonathan Safran Foer’s book, Eating Animals. She discusses her stance as a non-outspoken vegetarian and how reading Foer’s book has changed her into a fighting force for veganism. She begins her editorial with some backstory and humor about how she was always dicked around by her non-vegetarian friends.

oh no! a beautiful and intelligent woman! 'tis the end of the male species.

I’m sorry that your friends couldn’t let you be in your own non-meat world, but fuck them! Seriously.

The most interesting segment is that with which she closes. Portman identifies food as central to a sense of religion or faith. Foer’s book indicates that the symbolic nature of food pollutes our religious identities from body and blood at Holy Communion to the fictitious story of Thanksgiving. While Thanksgiving is more of a secular American holiday, it still has its Puritanical roots.

She goes on to recall her college professor’s lesson about elements of society that are looked back on as being barbaric or uncivilized–like slavery, segregation, or The Video Professor. Will Factory Farms create that same lack of civility feeling in the near future? Most likely…but will eating meat ever conjure up the feelings that PeTA and radical vegan groups want: an emotional abhorrence of carnivores and omnivores? Almost certainly fucking not.

hmm...maybe there's something to this PeTA shit after all...

Portman presents the fair point that various societies regard meat differently; for example, Americans don’t typically eat dog because we enjoy a certain affinity with them–but isn’t this attitude towards meat slightly dishonest? If you’re a meat eater, shouldn’t you be open to eating any kind of meat? I know I am.

My point is–and I’m going to sound like a total redneck pigfucker when I say this–that book learnin’ and college learnin’ ain’t necessarily “learnin’.” Okay, I could’ve said it better than that…

What I mean is, there are entire generations of students who leave college with an arrogant mentality. Somehow, because they believed every word their professor said, and their professor recommended some “books they should check out,” that they are somehow in a private club of intellectuals.

I’m not saying that Natalie Portman is one of these people. She’s a very intelligent person. I should know…I went to college.

But in her article for Huffington Post (and let’s be honest, most articles for Huffington are…) appears to be written by an arrogant college douchebag who wants people to make an informed decision based on 40% of the factual information.

Is Factory Farming contributing to environmental problems and possibly Global Warming? Yes…of course! But how much–and is it something that requires our immediate attention?

Should animals be treated humanely? Of course they should! What are we…animals? Oh…right.

it's more accurate.

I’m going to use the very argument that Portman dismisses in her article, which is: We are a species that has the opportunity to choose what we want to eat and what we don’t want to eat. Other animals don’t necessarily have that conscious decision. However, as animals, and as a product of Darwinian Natural Selection, we are inclined to be omnivorous. We have canine teeth to tear apart meat. We had an appendix to work out the bad shit in our food.

We are, in essence, a full-formed meat-eating species. If you choose to abstain from meat or animal products, that’s a lifestyle choice…like getting married, going into the priesthood, or renting Big Mama’s House II. You shouldn’t be demonized for that.

Eating meat is not a moral issue; and it absolutely should not be turned into one. If you don’t like Christians telling you that you’re going to burn in Hell for being a fag, don’t tell me I’m an evil person because I like a side of salted pig ass with my eggs.

Alex G/

(return to MAIN PAGE)

2 Comments

Filed under Hot News, Irrationality, Rant, Special Guest Blogger